Hillco Technologies

The Rancher’s Plight: Plastic Disease in the Herd

cattle, cow, nature-8016378.jpg

The danger of plastic ingestion by cattle, specifically the risks associated with net wrapped hay bales, cannot be overstated. This condition, otherwise known as “plastic disease,” causes severe health issues and even death in cattle. The most effective means of avoiding these losses in the herd is by removing net wrap before feeding.

Introduction

A rancher knows that cattle are hasty eaters and curious to-boot. This frequently leads to ingesting foreign objects. The result has been termed “hardware disease” from ingesting metal objects. A similar condition is caused by ingesting plastic materials like net wrap. Net wrap ingestion can block the flow of nutrients in the rumen, leading to severe health problems and potentially fatal outcomes.

Health Risks

Net wrap removal from rumen

When cows ingest net wrap, it can become compacted into hard masses or remain in its original form.

Regardless of its form, its presence obstructs nutrient flow because bacteria in the rumen cannot break down plastic. These obstructions can cause severe digestive issues, malnutrition, and even fatal bloating. In the vent that this compaction blocks the esophagus, it prevents the cow from belching resulting in a buildup of gas.

Case Studies

A Veterinarians’ Observation:

    • Cody Creelman, a veterinarian, recounted a case where a producer experienced high rates of free-gas bloating in cows due to net wrap ingestion. With the death-count at seven cows, post-mortem examinations were necessary. This investigation revealed plastic masses in their esophagi.
    • This producer’s conclusion was that he needed to remove the net wrap before feeding, effectively resolving the problem.

A Veterinarian’s Investigation:

    • Veterinarian John Campbell investigated the deaths of six cows from a well-managed herd. It was discovered that theses cows were close to calving and died due to large amounts of net wrap occluding the rumen outflow. Ultimately, it was this professional’s opinion that the combination of a full rumen and large uterus suffocated the cows by putting excessive pressure on their lungs.
    • Campbell observed that net wrap can create blockages at the exit into the intestine, causing malnutrition and a slow and persistent decline in health.

Preventative Measures

  • It is apparent that removing net wrap before feeding is crucial. Producers should cut off the net wrap or twine from bales, even if it requires extra effort, especially in cold conditions where the wrap may freeze to the bale.
  • Our solution to this obstacle is Hillco’s Wrap Twine Remover. The Wrap Twine Remover (WTR) from Hillco Technologies is an attachment that removes twine and net wrap from large round bales or large square bales, quickly and efficiently, without the operator ever leaving their seat. The WTR does not cut the bale in half and allows the bale to be placed directly into the feeder or tub grinder without being destroyed prior to placement. The “squeeze” function allows the operator to reposition or relocated the bale in mid-operation to another feeder without losing the entire bale.
  • Some producers drop the bale on the ground from a loader, causing additional hay loss, to help break loose the wrap. However, this step helps them ensure no hazardous remnants are left for cattle to ingest.

Other Sources of Plastic & Foreign Objects

  • Cattle may ingest other foreign materials like twine, plastic bags, and garbage, when hay is baled near roads or littered areas. These objects form large masses in the rumen, with results comparable to net wrap occlusions.
      • Even small amounts of plastic can cause significant issues, leading to partial blockages and symptoms like diarrhea.
      •  These symptoms are often mistaken for diseases.

Conclusion

  • Ingesting net wrap and other plastics is a growing concern for cattle health, with the potential to cause severe, often fatal, digestive issues.
  • Ranchers and producers must be diligent in net wrap removal before feeding in light of these health risks. The cost and effort spent in removing net wrap are minor compared to the potential loss of cattle and associated veterinary expenses.

Source: Beef Magazine

Facebook
Twitter
LinkedIn
Shopping Cart
Scroll to Top
close-roi-calculator
Return on Investment Calculator

This calculator is designed to determine the return on investment for a Hillco leveling system equipped combine versus a non-leveling combine operating in sloping conditions.

Crop Type
Wheat       Corn and Soybean
Acreage Information

Crop Information

Enter your operation's statistics and estimates.
Wheat
Corn
Soybeans

Acreage / Slope Information

Estimate the percentage of total harvested acres that lay within the various slope ranges in your farming operation.
For all Wheat Acreage
See Slope reference chart
Percentage slope values must equal 100%
100%
Your Harvest Speeds and Machine Harvested Yield (MHY)

Non-Leveling Ground Speed in MPH

Enter the average harvesting speed for your non-leveling combine in the various slope ranges at the average yield entered in the Crop Information section above.

Slope Reference Graph
Wheat
Corn
Soy

Reduction in Machine Harvested Yield (bu/acre)

Estimate the reduction of Machine Harvested Yield (MHY) for each slope range if you were harvesting at the speed you entered for 0-3% slopes. (The calcultor will then project expected reductions in MHY for each slope range at your previously estimated ground speeds.)

You may opt to enter the test data which was determined by actual field testing by Hillco (based on 5 mph harvesting speed).

Reduction in MHY is used in these calculations rather than field loss. Reduction in MHY is a more accurate guage of combine harvesting efficiency because it can be determined by actually weighing the harvested yield rather than estimating the amount of yield lost to the ground.

Use test data or your own
Corn
Soy
Your Combine and Header Information
Enter your expected combine harvesting efficiency. Typically a combine operates at approximately 70% efficiency. If the Total Annual Separator Hours calculated below look too small you may want to decrease the combine efficiency. If the Total Annual Separator Hours calculated below look too large you may want to increase the combine efficiency.
Wheat head width in feet
Corn head width in feet
Flex header width in feet
Combine Field Efficiency (Typically 70%)
(Must enter value other than 0%)
Your Operational Costs
This total should include additional cost of benefits and taxes. If you wish to include the grain cart operator's cost add the hourly wage to the combine operator hourly labor costs.
Combine Operator Labor Cost (per hour, including taxes and benefits)
Combine Fuel Cost

If you wish to include added grain cart fuel add hourly grain cart fuel usage to the combine fuel usage.

Combine Fuel Consumption (Hourly - Typically 11-13 gph)

Cost per added separator hour usually runs approximately $180 per hour for new combines to $30 per hour for older used combines. If you don't want to consider the added benefit of lower separator hours enter $0.

Cost Per Separator Hour
(How much does your combine devalue for each added separator hour of use?)

Use example prices below or obtain a quote from your local dealership.

List price examples for leveling systems used on John Deere combines:
Leveling System Model 2955S for -- 9560-70 STS combine dual tire, w/ Hillco Leveler Installed = $42,960.00 List Price

Leveling System Model 2970S for -- 96-97-9860-70 STS combine,dual tire w/ Hillco Leveler Installed = $42,085.00 List Price

List price examples for leveling systems used on Case-IH combines:
Leveling System Model 2800 for -- 2577-88 combine, dual tire w/Hillco Leveler, Installed = $42,210.00 List Price


See examples or call your local dealership for a quote.
(On Leveling System Financing)

Enter the number of years (from 1 to 5, whole number) for the desired calculation period.

Market value at the end of 5 years regardless of the length of the calculation period.

Used in net present value calculation

Cash Flows (Totals for Calculation Period)
Positive Cash Flows
Labor Savings
0
Fuel and Lubcriation Savings
0
Increased Income from Machine Harvested Yield
0
Residual Value of Leveling System (At end of Calculation Period)
0
Increased Combine Value Due to Reduced Separator Hours
0
Total Positive Cash Flows
0
Negative Cash Flows
Leveling System Cost (Total Principle & Interest Payments)
-0
Remaining Principle Balance On 5 Year Note
-0
Leveling System Maintenance Cost (Annual 2% of Purchase Price)
-0
Total Negative Cash Flows
-0
Total Net Cash Flow (Positive - Negative)
0
Investment Analysis
Total Average Annual Separator Hours (without leveling system)
0
Total Average Annual Separator Hours (with leveling system)
0
Average Annual Separator Hour Savings
0
Total Separator Hour Savings as % of Total Separator Hours
0
Average Payback Period (in years)
The length of time it takes for an investment to recover its initial cost.
0
Total Net Present Value of Cash Flows
NPV compares the value of a dollar today to the value of that same dollar in the future, taking inflation and returns into account.
0
Internal Rate of Return
The internal rate of return (IRR) method allows you to consider the time value of money. It is the interest rate that is equivalent to the dollar returns you expect from your project. Once you know the rate, you can compare it to the rates you could earn by investing your money in other projects or investments. Usually a business owner will insist that in order to be acceptable, a project must be expected to earn an IRR that is at least several percentage points higher than the cost of borrowing, to compensate the company for its risk, time, and trouble associated with the project.
0